Every project reports differently
One team uses one CDE, another uses its own. Comparing projects across the portfolio means normalising the data by hand.
For Owner-Developers
You answer to investors and to a board. SiteMind turns the models, costs, and documents across your portfolio into dashboards you can stand behind, and handovers you can score.
One team uses one CDE, another uses its own. Comparing projects across the portfolio means normalising the data by hand.
The model and the asset data arrive at handover. Whether they are complete and usable is something you find out later, in operations.
Board and investor updates pull from a dozen sources. Assembling one is itself a small project every quarter.
Every project rolls into one view: cost, schedule, coordination, and document health, side by side and comparable.
Score the model and asset data against your handover standard, so a project's completeness is a number you can see, not a surprise later.
ESG and embodied-carbon figures draw from the same federated data as the rest of the dashboard, so the report you send up is the report you trust.
Each project in the portfolio reports into the same structure, so a slow project sits visible next to a healthy one. At handover, the model and COBie data are scored against your standard, and a low score is something you act on before the project closes, not after the building is in operation. ESG and embodied-carbon reporting come from the same data, so the investor update and the operations record agree.
See reports and dashboardsProject health
Open clashes
24
−31% wk
RFI cycle
4.2d
−1.1d
Cost variance
+2.1%
on track
Issues resolved · 8 weeks
Every project reports into one structure, so a problem project stands out early.
Quality is scored before close-out, so operations inherits an asset record they can rely on.
The portfolio dashboard is the source, so quarterly reporting is a review rather than a rebuild.
Book a demo and bring your hardest cross-source question.